Bachelor of Science in Marine Transportation (BSMT)
AREA III
AREA III – CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION
EXHIBIT
PARAMETER A : CURRICULUM AND PROGRAM OF STUDIES
SYSTEM – INPUTS AND PROCESSES
A.S.1 – The curriculum provides for the development of the following professional competencies.
A.S.1.1 – acquisition of knowledge and theories in the discipline;
A.S.1.2 – application of the theories to real problems in the field; and
A.S.1.3 – demonstration of the skills to carry out the application or strategy in actual work setting.
A.S.2 – There is a system of validation of subjects taken from other schools.
A.S.3 – The curriculum reflects local, regional, and national goals as wells as Institutional vision and mission.
IMPLEMENTATION
A.I.1 The College/ Academic Unit Implements in the curriculum/ program of study in consonance of CMO as follows:
Bachelor of Science in Marin Transportation (181 units)
A.I.1.1 – General Education – 56 units
A.I.1.2 – Core/Professional – 71 units
A.I.1.3 – Non-academic – 14 units
A.I.1.4 – Shipboard Training 1 yr – 40 units
Bachelor of Science in Maritime Education (189 units)
A.I.1.5 – General Education – 58 units
A.I.1.6 – Core/Professional/Elective – 77 units
A.I.1.7 – Non-academic – 14 units
A.I.1.8 – Shipboard Training 1 yr – 40 units
A.I.2 – The subjects are logically sequenced and prerequisite subjects are identified.
A.I.3 – The curricular content is responsive to the needs of the country and recent developments in the profession.
A.I.4 – The curricular content covers professional and technical preparation required of its graduates with the thesis/research/project requirements focusing on identified areas.
A.I.5 – The curriculum integrates values, reflective of national customs, culture and tradition in cases where applicable.
A.I.6 – Opportunities for participation in hands-on activities such as immersion/practical training and field study are maintained in the curriculum.
A.I.7 – The following activities are undertaken to ensure quality in the process of curriculum development:
A.I.7.1 – participative planning and designing by the following stakeholders:
A.I.7.1.1 – administration;
A.I.7.1.2 – faculty;
A.I.7.1.3 – students;
A.I.7.1.4 – alumni;
A.I.7.1.5 – representatives from the industry/sector; and
A.I.7.1.6 – others
A.I.7.2 – periodic review, assessment, updating and approval of the curriculum by the Academic Council;
A.I.7.3 – confirmation of the curriculum by the Board of Regents(BOR)/Board of Trustees(BOT); and
A.I.7.4 – others
A.I.8 – The program of study allows the accommodation of students with special needs and assist them to finish the degree.
OUTCOME/S
A.O.1 – The curriculum is responsive and relevant to demand of time.
A.O.2 – There is average performance in the licensure Examination/Equivalent.
PARAMETER B : INSTRUCTIONAL PROCESS, METHODOLOGIES AND LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES
SYSTEM – INPUTS AND PROCESSES
B.S.1 – there is an Institutional outcomes-based standard format in the preparation of course syllabi
B.S.2 – The syllabus includes a list of suggested readings and references of print and electronic resources published within the last ten (10) years.
B.S.3 – Copies of all course syllabi during the term are available at the Dean’s office or in any other appropriate repository.
B.S.4 – Copies of all course syllabi in previous terms are filled for references purposes.
B.S.5 – There is provision for remedial measures to strengthen the basic skills in Mathematics and English and other “tool” subjects.
B.S.6 – There is mechanism to facilitate the teaching-learning process.
IMPLEMENTATION
B.I.1 – The Dean of official concerned approves the updated syllabus for each subject.
B.I.2 – The faculty prepare syllabi with comprehensive contents.
B.I.3 – The faculty revise and enhance the syllabus preferably every two years and as needed.
B.I.4 – The faculty distribute a copy of the syllabus to each student
B.I.5 – Teaching strategies stimulate the development of the students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) such as critical thinking, analytical thinking, creative thinking and problem-solving. Teaching strategies stimulate development of the students’ higher-order thinking skills(HOTS).
Teaching Methods and Techniques
B.I.6 – Classroom instruction is enriched through the use of the following strategies:
B.I.6.1 – symposia, seminars, workshops, professional lectures;
B.I.6.2 – educational tours/learning visits/other co-curricular activities;
B.I.6.3 – peer-teaching/cooperative learning; and
B.I.6.4 – computer-assisted instruction (CAI) and computer-assisted learning (CAL)
B.I.7 – At least three(3) of the following course requirements are used:
B.I.7.1 – group/individual projects;
B.I.7.2 – group/individual reports;
B.I.7.3 – group/individual term papers;
B.I.7.4 – performance activities;
B.I.7.5 – learning contract;
B.I.7.6 – portfolio
B.I.7.7 – research study
B.I.7.8 – learning modules; and
B.I.7.9- others
B.I.8 – At least three (3) of the following course requirements are used:
B.I.8.1 – film showing;
B.I.8.2 – projects;
B.I.8.3 – group dynamics;
B.I.8.4 – case study;
B.I.8.5 – workshops;
B.I.8.6 – simulations;
B.I.8.7 – dimensional question approach;
B.I.8.8 – brainstorming;
B.I.8.9 – buzz sessions/panel discussions;
B.I.8.10 – informal creative groups;
B.I.8.11 – interactive learning;
B.I.8.12 – team teaching;
B.I.8.13 – micro teaching;
B.I.8.14 – macro teaching;
B.I.8.15 – tandem teaching;
B.I.8.16 – peer teaching;
B.I.8.17 – multi-media/courseware/teach ware;
B.I.8.18 – experiments;
B.I.8.19 – problem-solving;
B.I.8.20 – type study methods;
B.I.8.21 – reporting;
B.I.8.22 – panel discussion; and
B.I.8.23 – others
B.I.9 – Instructional strategies provide for student individual needs and multiple intelligences.
B.I.10 – Instruction is enhanced through the following:
B.I.10.1 – submission of approved and updated syllabus per subject;
B.I.10.2 – regular classroom observation/supervision.
B.I.10.3 – regular faculty meetings with the Dean/Academic Unit head;
B.I.10.4 – regular faculty performance evaluation;
B.I.10.5 – attendance/participation of faculty in in-service training;
B.I.10.6 – conduct of experimental classes; and
B.I.10.7 – adoption of instructional delivery modes such as modules, e-learning, on-line study, etc.
B.I.11 – IMs are approved by the IMC of the Institution.
B.I.12 – Varied, multi-sensor materials and computer programs are utilized for instruction.
B.I.13 – The College/Academic Unit maintains consortia and linkages with other learning institutions for academic exchange of instructional materials.
B.I.14 – The faculty are encouraged to product their own instructional materials such as modules, software, visual aids, manuals and textbooks.
B.I.15 – Theoretical class observation, takes into account the following:
B.I.15.1 – use of teaching and training aids;
B.I.15.2 – supply of notes or materials to students;
B.I.15.3 – teaching materials;
B.I.15.4 – quality of student works; and
B.I.15.5 – methods of delivery.
B.I.16 – Practical and laboratory exercises observation, takes into account the following:
B.I.16.1 – quality of student works;
B.I.16.2 – range of quality of work;
B.I.16.3 – supervision of students; and
B.I.16.4 – operational safety.
OUTCOME/S
B.O.1 – Course syllabi are updated and approved by concerned authorities.
B.O.2 – Varied teaching strategies are efficiently and effectively used.
B.O.3 – Instructional materials produced by faculty are copyrighted and patented.
PARAMETER C : ASSESSMENT OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE
SYSTEM – INPUTS AND PROCESSES
C.S.1 – The program of studies has a system of evaluating student performance through a combination of the following:
C.S.1.1 – formative tests such as quizzes, unit tests;
C.S.1.2 – summative tests such as mid-term and final examination;
C.S.1.3 – project and term papers;
C.S.1.4 – practicum and performance tests; and
C.S.1.5 – other course requirements.
C.S.2 – The examination system is based on the following guidelines:
C.S.2.1 – policies and procedures;
C.S.2.2 – description of the examination scheme;
C.S.2.3 – relation of examination scheme to course objective;
C.S.2.4 – arrangements of determining passing or failure; and
C.S.2.5 – contents of the examinations in relation to the required competence standards of the STCW; and
C.S.2.6 – arrangements for review and validation of examination.
C.S.3 – based on well-designed Table of specifications (TOS)
C.S.3.1 – comprehensive enough to test the different levels of cognitive skills and knowledge of content; and
C.S.3.2 – based on well-designed Table of Specifications (TOS).
IMPLEMENTATION
C.I.1 – Varied evaluation measures are used, such as:
C.I.1.1 – portfolio;
C.I.1.2 – rubric assessment;
C.I.1.3 – skills demonstration;
C.I.1.4 – paper and pencil tests;
C.I.1.5 – oral examinations;
C.I.1.6 – group/individual reports;
C.I.1.7 – group/individual projects; and
C.I.1.8 – others
C.I.2 – Evaluation tools/instruments are reviewed and revised periodically.
C.I.3 – The faculty are trained how to assess student performance properly.
C.I.4 – The College/Academic Unit encourages and supports assessment for multiple intelligences.
C.I.5 – Course requirements are returned to students after results are check, recorder and analyzed.
C.I.6 – The system of student evaluation and grading is defined, understood, and disseminated to:
C.I.6.1 – students;
C.I.6.2 – faculty;
C.I.6.3 – academic administrators;
C.I.6.4 – parents/guardians; and
C.I.6.5 – shipboard training officers.
OUTCOME/S
C.O.1 – The students’ academic performance is commendable.
C.O.2 – Retention rate of students is on the average.
PARAMETER : D MANAGEMENT OF LEARNING
SYSTEM – INPUTS AND PROCESSES
D.S.1 – There are policies on management of learning which include the following:
D.S.1.1 – students’ attendance in class and other academic activities;
D.S.1.2 – schedule of classes;
D.S.1.3 – students’ discipline; and
D.S.1.4 – maintenance of cleanliness and orderliness.
IMPLEMENTATION
D.I.1 – The policies management of learning are enforced.
D.I.2 – Students activities are well-planned.
D.I.3 – Assignments are designed to reinforce teaching which results to student’s maximum learning.
D.I.4 – Maximum class size of 50 for undergraduate course is enforced.
D.I.5 – Classroom discipline is maintained in consonance with democratic practices.
D.I.6 – The class officers and assigned student assist in maintaining cleanliness of classrooms, laboratories, corridors and the school campus.
D.I.7 – Independent work and performance in the following are monitored.
D.I.7.1 – case studies/reports;
D.I.7.2 – shipboard training; and
D.I.7.3 – others
D.I.8 – In practicum courses, the number of trainees for each coordinator may not exceed 50.
OUTCOME/S
D.O.1 – Learning and effectively managed.
PARAMETER E : GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS
SYSTEM – INPUTS AND PROCESSES
E.S.1 – There is a policy efficiently and effectively managed.
IMPLEMENTATION
E.I.1 – The students are regularly informed of the academic requirements of their courses.
E.I.2 – The College/Academic Unit implements the system for student returnees and transferees to meet the residence and other graduation requirements.
E.I.3 – Graduating students conduct research and/or undergo practicum/OJT or other activities prescribed in their respective curricula.
E.I.4 – The Collage/Department of Maritime Education assists the graduating students with academic deficiencies, disciplinary cases and other problems which hinder issuance of clearances.
E.I.5 – A clearance from academic and financial accountabilities and responsibilities is required before graduation.
OUTCOME/S
E.O.1 – At least 60% of the students enrolled in the program graduate within the regular time frame.
PARAMETER F : ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT FOR EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION
SYSTEM – INPUTS AND PROCESSES
F.S.1 – The institution has policies on:
F.S.1.1 – substitution or special arrangements whenever a teacher is on leave or absent;
F.S.1.2 – giving awards and/or recognition for faculty and students with outstanding achievements; and
F.S.1.3 – supervision, monitoring and evaluation of faculty performance.
IMPLEMENTATION
F.I.1 – The institution implements rules on attendance of the faculty in their respective classes.
F.I.2 – Dialogues are regularly conducted b the administration with the:
F.I.2.1 – the faculty; and
F.I.2.2 – students.
F.I.3 – Quality instruction is assured through the following strategies:
F.I.3.1 – conducting seminar/workshop on syllabi making;
F.I.3.2 – holding workshops on test construction and the corresponding table of specifications;
F.I.3.3 – conducting competency assessment;
F.I.3.4 – conducting supervisory visits of classes;
F.I.3.5 – holding of regular faculty meetings;
F.I.3.6 – requiring consultations between students and faculty;
F.I.3.7 – encouraging the conduct of studies on academic performance of faculty and students;
F.I.3.8 – conducting studies on academic performance of students;
F.I.3.9 – providing opportunities for the participation of the faculty in in-service training activities; and
F.I.3.10 – conduct of appropriate guidance in assessment methods and practice for Shipboard training Officers.
F.I.4 – Periodic faculty performance evaluation on instruction and other functions is done by at least three of the following:
F.I.4.1 – the academic head/department chairperson;
F.I.4.2 – students;
F.I.4.3 – the faculty member himself/herself;
F.I.4.4 – peers; and
F.I.4.5 – others
F.I.5 – The results of performance evaluation are utilized to improve the performance of the faculty.
F.I.6 – Students are given recognition for exemplary academic and non-academic performances.
F.I.7 – Outstanding achievement is recognized and encouraged through the following:
F.I.7.1 – inclusion in honor roll, Dean’s list, etc.;
F.I.7.2 – grant if tuition scholarship;
F.I.7.3 – award of honor medals and merit certificates;
F.I.7.4 – membership in honor societies/honor class/sections, etc.;
F.I.7.5 – grant of special privileges such as opportunities in leadership and others (including exemption from major exams on all professional business subjects); and
F.I.7.6 – grant of awards and recognition for their outstanding academic accomplishments e.g., Best Thesis, Student Researcher of the Year, etc.
F.I.8 – Indicators on performance of graduates are studied such as:
F.I.8.1 – analysis of performance of graduates in the Maritime Licensure Examination;
F.I.8.2 – employability of graduates; and
F.I.8.3 – feedback from employers regarding performance of graduates.
OUTCOME/S
F.O.1 – The faculty and students have commendable performance as a result of administrative support.
F.O.2 – The graduates of the program are employable.